During the failure investigation process, the first step is a visit to the incident site to gather facts and evidence relevant to the failure and to document the appearance of the site. Once we have obtained and examined the evidence, we begin developing potential failure scenarios. Information pertinent to these scenarios is often obtained by searching available documents and the technical literature. To further evaluate potential failure theories, engineering analysis & modeling is generally performed.

The types of engineering analyses used in our failure investigations include:

  • Stress (linear and nonlinear)
  • Fluid mechanics (static and dynamic)
  • Heat transfer (steady state and transient)
  • Fracture mechanics (linear elastic, elastic/plastic)
  • Material Failure (fatigue, creep, corrosion, plastic flow)

Special loading conditions evaluated in these analyses include:

  • Thermal
  • Pressure
  • Impact
  • Seismic
  • Vibration
  • Explosion

Stress Analysis of a Steam Header Experiencing Thermal Shock


Finite Element Model of Stresses
Caused by Denting a Float Ball
Initial analyses often employ closed form, hand calculation methods to approximate structure or fluid behavior. This approach serves two purposes. The first is to provide an initial screening of potential failure modes and the second is to serve as a check on later more sophisticated, and expensive, computer models (finite element or finite difference). In some cases the results from the closed form analytical approach are sufficient to pin down the failure mode. However, in many cases the available data is insufficient for this approach to be sufficiently accurate.
In these instances, we may be faced with the following challenges: a very complex design; unknown history of past designs and materials; incomplete operation and maintenance records; and absence of key evidence. For these problems, the failed item is simulated on a computer using “finite element” software. Parametric models are often built in order to investigate the effects of various component changes on the integrity of the structure. Parameters used in these models include: geometry, material properties, loading conditions, repairs, and fabrication defects.
APTECH’s library of computer codes provides considerable flexibility in handling a variety of modeling problems. We are always seeking the latest software packages. This, coupled with in-house development of new and efficient post-processing techniques, allows us to continually expand our capabilities.

Of course, the analysis is only as good as the person doing it. In addition to the skill required to build an accurate model, the analyst must be able to choose realistic input data and boundary conditions. The analyst must then be able to tell if the result is accurate and “real world.” APTECH’s analysts have the ability to do both since they are hands-on, practicing engineers with years of hardware experience in the field and in the lab. Their “native feel” for hardware, equipment and devices is a crucial value-added skill that they bring to our clients.

This page has examples of some of our past work. Please click on the arrows to see brief clips of the models in action.

 

   


Boiler Model: APTECH created a model of a boiler's superheater tubing to evaluate the effect of changing combustion conditions on the backpass heat exchangers.


Pipe Flow Model


Radio telescope track
displacement model


 

 
   


© 2005, APTECH Engineering Services, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form without the express written permission of an officer of the company is strictly prohibited.

xyberMEDiA.com Web Site DesignWeb & graphics design by xyberMEDiA.com. Report problems to support@xybermedia.com AFG-V2.0 Site Requirements